<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court of the United Kingdom website opens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bla.nointrigue.com/blog/2009/09/06/supreme-court-of-the-united-kingdom-website-opens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bla.nointrigue.com/blog/2009/09/06/supreme-court-of-the-united-kingdom-website-opens/</link>
	<description>my random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 03:04:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Chen</title>
		<link>http://bla.nointrigue.com/blog/2009/09/06/supreme-court-of-the-united-kingdom-website-opens/comment-page-1/#comment-37728</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bla.nointrigue.com/blog/?p=562#comment-37728</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-37727&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Dan &lt;/a&gt; Interesting point - apparently there were an odd number of Law Lords for a long time, until the number was upped from 9 to 12 in 1994. Twelve is a significant number - apostles, zodiac, months, jurors on a jury - I wonder if the number was determined with such connections in mind.

In any case, the Law Lords - and the new Supreme Court - will sit in odd-numbered benches: &lt;a href=&quot;http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/columnists/article3349334.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This column&lt;/a&gt; by David Pannick QC is informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-37727" rel="nofollow">@Dan </a> Interesting point &#8211; apparently there were an odd number of Law Lords for a long time, until the number was upped from 9 to 12 in 1994. Twelve is a significant number &#8211; apostles, zodiac, months, jurors on a jury &#8211; I wonder if the number was determined with such connections in mind.</p>
<p>In any case, the Law Lords &#8211; and the new Supreme Court &#8211; will sit in odd-numbered benches: <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/columnists/article3349334.ece" rel="nofollow">This column</a> by David Pannick QC is informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://bla.nointrigue.com/blog/2009/09/06/supreme-court-of-the-united-kingdom-website-opens/comment-page-1/#comment-37727</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bla.nointrigue.com/blog/?p=562#comment-37727</guid>
		<description>It appears that there will be an even number (12) of judges on the new Supreme Court. How could they let that one slip...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that there will be an even number (12) of judges on the new Supreme Court. How could they let that one slip&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

